Quantcast
Channel: Medicare denial codes, reason, action and Medical billing appeal
Viewing all 194 articles
Browse latest View live

Provider not certified denial - what need to be done

$
0
0
CO B7 Provider was not certified/eligible to be paid for this procedure/service on this date service

(THIS PHYSICIAN/SUPPLIER IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE PAYMENT)



Resources/tips for avoiding this denial

Services were denied because the date of service(s) on the claim is prior to the effective date or after the termination date of the Medicare enrollment of the billing provider who appears on the claim.



• Ensure to submit only claims for services during which the provider had active Medicare billing privileges.

• If services were provided prior to or after a provider's Medicare billing privileges were active, this denial will be received.



Tips to correct the denied claim

Verify the correct date of service(s) appears on your Medicare Remittance Advice (RA).

• If the date of service(s) on the RA is not correct, the procedures for correcting claims errors should be followed.

• Clerical error reopening requests to correct the date of service can be performed.

• If the date of service(s) is correct, there may be an issue with the effective or termination date of the provider’s Medicare billing number.

what is WO - withholding and FB - Forward balance and FCN

$
0
0
PROVIDER ADJ DETAILS


The provider-level adjustment details section is used to show adjustments that are not specific to a particular claim or service on this SPR.

PLB REASON CODE – This field indicates the various provider-level adjustment reason codes that may be used. Examples include:



• 50 – Late charge – Used to identify Late Claim Filing Penalty.

• L6 – Interest owed – Used for the interest paid on claim on an RA.

• WO – Withholding – Used to recover previous overpayments. A reference number (the original ICN) is applied for tracking purposes. The WO amount is subtracted from the check amount.

• FB – Forwarding Balance – Reflects the difference in the payment between the original claim and the overpayment/adjustment to the original claim. An FB will be on an RA any time a claim has been overpaid/adjusted. This amount does not reflect a withholding on this claim. Providers should receive a letter requesting this amount and instructions for refund. If the refund is not received in approximately 45 days, the amount will be reflected as a “WO” on a future remittance.

When the adjustment shows a corrected payment of less than the original claim payment, an FB reflects a negative amount. When the adjustment shows a corrected payment of more than the original claim payment, the FB reflects a positive amount.

The RA will identify the associated FB with the FCN (ICN).



FCN – Indicates the Financial Control Number (FCN) that this adjustment relates to when the adjustment refers to a claim that appeared on a previous RA. This usually matches the ICN field of a previous claim. If the adjustment in question does not relate to a previous claim, this field is left blank.

AMT – This field indicates the amount of the provider-level adjustment. These adjustments can either decrease the payment (a positive number) or increase the payment (a negative number).


OVERPAYMENT/ADJUSTMENT


ADJS – Adjustment.

PREV PD – Displays the amount the provider was previously paid on this claim.

INTEREST – Interest amount.

LATE FILING CHARGE – Amount charged to the provider for filing a claim past the claim filing time limits.

PROV PD AMT – The provider paid amount is the total net amount (the amount Medicare owes the provider for this claim) minus any Forwarding Balance (FB).



PROV ADJ AMT – The provider adjustment amount is the total amount of any Withholding (WO) amounts. Provides the amount the check has been adjusted from the provider’s paid amount.

What are the documents needed for SNF

$
0
0
Documentation needed for Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF), Part A

•    Please be sure documentation submitted is legible.
•    Please submit records for all dates of service on the claim.
•    Please ensure the medical records submitted provide proof the service(s) was ordered and rendered. Also, ensure the medical records provide justification supporting medical necessity for the service by submission of the following documentation:
o    All applicable Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for the period billed, including documents to support the number of days of the MDS look-back period.
o    Medical records for 30 days prior to each Additional Documentation Request (ARD).
o    Acute hospital discharge summary and transfer form.
o    History and physical.
o    Admission assessment.
o    Any relevant hospital documentation to support five-day MDS assessment.
o    Physician’s certification and recertification for skilled care.
o    Physician’s orders specifying need for SNF care.
o    Physician’s orders physician/Non-Physician Practitioner (NPP) order/intent.
o    Physician’s progress notes.
o    Care plans.
o    Skill sheets/records.
o    Treatment records.
o    Medication Administration Records (MAR).
o    Nurse’s notes.
o    Intake and output log.
o    Vital sign log.
o    Weight records.
o    Treatment and medication sheets.
o    Rehabilitation notes.
o    Initial therapy evaluation.
o    Therapy evaluation/re-evaluation.
o    Therapy progress notes.
o    Treatment logs to identify therapy minutes.
o    Signatures/credentials of professionals providing services.
o    Any other documentation a provider deems necessary to support medical necessity of services billed, as well as documentation specifically requested in the ADR letter.

Denial Group Codes - PR, CO, CR and OA explanation

$
0
0

Group codes identify the financially responsible party or the general category of payment adjustment. A group code must always be used in conjunction with a CARC.

Group codes are codes that will always be shown with a reason code to indicate when a provider may or may not bill a beneficiary for the non-paid balance of the services furnished.

Payment Adjustment Category Description

• PR (Patient Responsibility).

• CO (Contractual Obligation).

• OA (Other Adjustment).

• CR (Correction or Reversal to a prior decision).



Group Code PR

All denials or reductions from the billed amount with group code PR are the financial responsibility of the beneficiary or his supplemental insurer (if it covers that service).

Due to the frequency of their use, separate columns have been set aside for reporting of deductible and coinsurance, both of which are also the patient’s responsibility.

PR amounts, including deductible and coinsurance, are totaled in the Patient Responsibility field at the end of each claim.



Charges that have not been paid by Medicare and/or are not included in a PR group are:

• Late filing penalty (reason code B4),

• Excess charges on an assigned claim (reason code 42),

• Excess charges attributable to rebundled services (reason code B15),

• Charges denied as a result of the failure to submit necessary information by a provider who accepts assignment,

• Services that are not reasonable and necessary for care (reason code 50 or 57) for which there are no indemnification agreements are the liability of the provider.



Providers may be subject to penalties if they bill a patient for charges not identified with the PR group code.

Group Code OA

Group code OA is used when neither PR nor CO applies, such as with the reason code message that indicates the bill is being paid in full.

Group Code CR

Group code CR - Correction to or reversal of a prior decision is used when there is a change to the decision on a previously adjudicated claim, perhaps as the result of a subsequent reopening.

This group applies whenever there is a change to a previously adjudicated claim. Separate reason code entries must be used in the NSF for the CR group entry and any other groups that apply to the readjudicated claim. At least one reason code is always used with a group code in the NSF. We always enter the reason code(s) and that amount from the initial remittance advice for the service being corrected with the CR, and include any additional reason code that may apply to the subsequent adjustment. If the change does not involve a prior denial/reduction reason code reason code 93 is used

Reminder: Group code CR explains the reason for change and is always used in conjunction with PR, CO or OA to show revised information.



.

Group Code CO

Group code CO- Contractual obligations is always used to identify excess amounts for which the law prohibits Medicare payment and absolves the beneficiary of any financial responsibility, such as:

• Amounts for services not considered being reasonable and necessary.

• Participation agreement violations or Limiting charge violations.

• Assignment amount violations,

• Excess charges by a managed care plan provider,

• Late filing penalties,

• Gramm-Rudman reductions,

• Medical necessity denials/reductions.

The patient may not be billed for these amounts.

PR B9 Denail code and Action - Enrolled in hospice

$
0
0

PR B9 Patient is enrolled in a hospice


(THESE SERVICES ARE DENIED BECAUSE THE PATIENT IS IN A HOSPICE)

Resources/tips for avoiding this denial

Specific guidelines exist pertaining to Medicare hospice benefits. Certain Medicare coverage does not apply to a beneficiary enrolled in a hospice program.

• View the document titled Medicare Hospice Benefits , detailing guidelines applying to hospice cases

Before submitting a patient's claim to Medicare Part B, contact the Part B interactive voice response (IVR) system to determine if the patient is enrolled in a hospice program. The following beneficiary information can be obtained:

• Hospice effective date

• Hospice termination date (if applicable)

• Servicing contractor number



Certain modifiers apply when services or providers are not related to hospice:

• Modifier GV: Attending physician not employed or paid under agreement by the patient’s hospice provider

• Modifier GW: Services not related to the hospice patient’s terminal condition

• If a modifier is applicable to the claim, apply the appropriate modifier prior to submitting the claim.



Tips to correct the denied claim

If you have submitted the claim without an appropriate modifier, refer to the modifier guidelines above.

• If a modifier is applicable to the claim, apply the appropriate modifier and resubmit the claim.

If you have submitted the claim with a GV modifier, double-check the patient's file to ensure the attending physician is in fact not employed by the hospice provider.

• If the system suspected a match when cross-referencing the performing provider with the list of hospice providers, this denial may have been assessed.

If you have submitted the claim with a GW modifier, double-check the primary diagnosis on the claim to ensure the services are not related to the hospice patient's terminal condition.

• Ensure the correct diagnosis is submitted on the claim.

• For example, if the patient's terminal condition is pancreatic cancer and the primary diagnosis on the claim is cancer-related, this can be considered related and would cause the denial.

If the modifier has been applied appropriately, it may be necessary to appeal the decision.

Medicare top ten errors

$
0
0
This Claim is rejected for relational field due to Billing Provider’s submitter not approved for electronic claim submissions on behalf of this Billing Provider (A8:496:85)

   
This Claim is rejected for Invalid Information for a Subscriber’s contract/member number (A7:164:IL)

   
This Claim is rejected for relational field Billing Provider’s NPI (National Provider ID) and Tax ID (A8:562:85 – A8:128:85)

   
This Claim is rejected for relational field Information within the Detailed description of service (A8:306)

   
This Claim is rejected for Invalid Information for the Subscriber's Postal/Zip Code(A7:500:IL)
   

   
This Claim is rejected for relational field Information within the HCPCS (A7:507)
   
   
This Claim is rejected for Invalid Information in the Billing Provider's NPI (National Provider ID) (A7:562:85)
   
   
This Claim is rejected for Invalid Information for a Rendering Provider's National Provider Identifier (NPI). (A7:562:82)

   
This Claim is rejected for relational field due to Billing Provider's submitter not approved for electronic claim submissions on behalf of this Billing Provider .(A7:562:85)

   
This Claim is rejected for Invalid Information within the Diagnosis code (A7:254)

FORMAL GRIEVANCE PROCESS - Careplus

$
0
0
CarePlus members have 60 calendar days from the date of occurrence to file a formal grievance to the health plan.
 
Any Member who has a grievance against CarePlus or its providers for any matter may submit an oral or a written statement of the grievance to CarePlus.  A grievance form may be requested from the Member Services  or  the  Grievance  &  Appeals  Department.    The  oral  or  written  grievance  should  contain  the following:

a.  Member’s name, and identification number,
b.  Summary of occurrence,
c.  Description of the relief sought;
d.  The Member’s signature; and
e.  The date the grievance was signed.

The  written  statement  or  Grievance  Form  must  be  forwarded  to  the  CarePlus  Grievance  &  Appeals Department to the following address or fax number: 

CAREPLUS HEALTH PLANS, INC.
11430 NW 20th Street, Suite 300
Doral, Florida 33172
Attention: Grievance & Appeals Department
Fax: (800) 956-4288


Grievances will be resolved in accordance with the Medicare Managed Care Manual mandated by CMS.

24 hours for expedited grievances.  Expedited grievances exist whenever:
  The  health  plan  extends  the  time  frame  to  make  an  organization/coverage  determination  or reconsideration or redetermination; or
  The health plan refuses to grant a request for an expedited organization/coverage determination, reconsideration or redetermination

30 calendar days for standard grievances.  Prompt appropriate action, including a full investigation of the grievance as expeditiously as the member’s case requires, based on the member’s health status, but no later than 30 calendar days from the date the oral written request is received, unless extended as permitted under 42 CFR 422.564 (e)(2).

CarePlus member will be referred to FMQAI, Florida’s Quality Improvement Organization (QIO), should the  grievance  be  relating  to  the  quality  of  care  or  service  from  the  plan  or  its  providers.    CarePlus member’s may also send inquiries or call FMQAI directly at the following:

FMQAI
5201 West Kennedy Blvd., Suite 900
Tampa, Florida 33609 
(800) 844-0795

MEDICARE RECONSIDERATION (APPEALS) - Careplus HMO

$
0
0
A Request for Reconsideration (Appeal) is a written request by a Medicare HMO member (his/her legal guardian,  authorized  representative,  or  power  of  attorney),  or  a  non-participating  provider,  (who  has signed  a  waiver  indicating  he/she  will  not  seek  payment  from  the  member  for  the  item  or  service  in question). A physician who is providing treatment to a member, upon providing notice to the member, may  request  an  expedited  or  standard  reconsideration  on  the  member’s  behalf  without  having  been appointed as the member’s authorized representative.

To reconsider Plan’s Initial Determination to deny payment of a claim or authorize a service, a request for reconsideration must be received within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of an initial determination. A decision on a request for reconsideration must be expedited as the member’s health condition requires, but  no  later  than  72  hours  for  situations  where  applying  the  standard  time  procedure  could  seriously jeopardize the enrollees life, health or ability to regain maximum function, thirty (30) calendar days for a standard service request and sixty (60) calendar days if the request is for the Payment of a denied claim.

Formal Appeal Process:
There are six (6) levels of the Appeals process:

1.  The initial determination (organization determination)
2.  Appeal Reconsideration.
3.    Reconsideration by the Independent Review Entity:  MAXIMUS Federal Services, Inc.
4.  Hearing  by  an  Administrative  Law  Judge  (ALJ),  if  at  least  $140.00  (amount  in  2013)  is  in controversy.
5.  Medicare Appeals Council (MAC);
6.  Judicial review, if at least $1,400.00 (amount in 2013) is in controversy.

Appeal Reconsideration:
A Request for Reconsideration (Appeal) is received within sixty (60) calendar days of the adverse initial determination.  A Medicare member can also appeal through the local Social Security (SSA) office or Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) office (if member is a railroad annuitant). 

The  Grievance  &  Appeals  Correspondence  Specialist  assigns  the  case  to  the  Grievance  &  Appeals Specialist for research. The Grievance & Appeals Specialist acknowledges the request for reconsideration (appeal)  within  five  (5)  calendar  days  of  receipt.  If  a  member’s  issue  involves  both  an  appeal  and grievance, they are worked simultaneously.

In all cases, payment of claims or authorization for services and notification to member/non-contracted provider must be made within, 72 hours for expedited request, thirty (30) calendar days for a standard request for a service and sixty (60) calendar days for payment of a denied claim.  If sufficient information to  make  a  determination  is  not  received  within  the  allowed  processing  time,  a  determination  must  be made based on the information received. (An extension of up to fourteen (14) calendar days can be made if requested by the member or if the plan justifies the need for additional information and it is in the best interest of the member).  Members will be advised of their right to file an expedited grievance should they not agree to the extension.

If a decision cannot be made or if the denial is upheld in whole, or in part, the entire file is forwarded along  with  written  explanation  of  the  decision  to  MAXIMUS  Federal  Services,  Inc.  for  a  new determination  by  the,  72
nd  hour,  30th  or  60th  day.    The  member/appointed  representative/treating physician/non-contracted provider is notified verbally and followed-up in writing.

MAXIMUS advises the member/appointed representative/treating physician/non-contracted provider and the plan of its decision in writing within the required time frames depending on the level of the appeal stating the reason(s) for the decision and inform the member/non-contracted provider of his or her right to a  hearing  before  an  Administrative  Law  Judge  of  the  Social  Security  Administration  if  the  denial  is upheld and the amount in controversy meets the appropriate threshold requirement.
  
If the denial is overturned by MAXIMUS, the request for a service is provided as expeditiously as the member’s  health  requires  but  no  later  than  72  hours  for  an  expedited  appeal,  14  calendar  days  for  a standard service appeal or 30 calendar days for a standard claim appeals.

If the amount in controversy is at least $140.00 in 2013, the member/non-contracted provider may appeal MAXIMUS' decision by requesting a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The request must be submitted in writing within sixty (60) days after the date of notice of the adverse reconsideration determination  and  must  be  filed  with  the  entity  specified  in  MAXIMUS'  reconsideration  notice.  If CarePlus  receives  a  written  request  for  an  ALJ  hearing  from  an  enrollee,  CarePlus  must  forward  the enrollee's request to MAXIMUS.

An adverse decision or case dismissed by the ALJ can be reviewed by the Medicare Appeals Council (MAC), either by its own action or as the result of a request form the member/non-contracted provider or CarePlus.  If the MAC grants the request for review, it may either issue a final decision or dismissal, or remand the case to the ALJ with instructions.  MAC review must be requested in writing within sixty (60) days of the ALJ adverse determination.

If the amount remaining in controversy is at least $1,400.00 in 2013, the member/non-contracted provider of CarePlus may request a Judicial Review. The review must be requested in writing within sixty (60) days of the MAC’s adverse determination.

The entity which makes an initial reconsidered or revised determination may re-open the determination. 

Re-openings occur after a decision has been made.  Re-openings may be granted:

-   To correct an error
-   In response to suspected fraud
-  In response to the receipt of information not available or known to exist at the time the claim were initially processed

A re-opening is not an appeal right. A party may request a reopening even if it still has appeal rights, as long  as  the  guidelines  of  the  re-opening  are  met.    For  example,  if  a  member  receives  an  adverse determination, but later obtains relevant medical records, he or she may request a re-opening rather than a hearing  before  an  ALJ.    However,  if  the  beneficiary  did  not  have  additional  information  and  just disagreed with the reasoning of the decision, he or she must file an appeal.  If a member requests a re-opening  while  he  or  she  still  has  appeal  rights,  he  or  she  will  also  file  for  the  appeal  and  ask  for  a continuance until the re-opening is decided.  If the re-opening is denied or the original determination is not revised, the party retains its appeal rights.

The  party  that  filed  the  reconsideration  may  withdraw  that  request.    The  withdrawal  must  be  filed  in writing  to  the  Plan,  the  Social  Security  Office  or  the  Railroad  Retirement  Board  office  (for  railroad retirees).  The withdrawal will be acknowledged in writing by the Plan.

What is Clinical Appeals

$
0
0

Any  provider  may  appeal  an  unfavorable  decision  regarding  a  denial  of  a  Pre-Service Request  for  physician  services  or  denial  of  authorization  for  hospital  (emergency  room, observation, inpatient, or outpatient) services. There shall be a general appeals process for items  of  a  routine  nature,  and  an  expedited  appeals  process  for  items  of  an  urgent  or emergent nature. The final decision of whether to expedite the appeal will be made by the
Plan.

For clinical appeals, the provider will have sixty (60) days to appeal to the Plan from the date of the initial denial of the service. Thereafter, the Plan will have thirty (30) days to process the clinical appeal in which the following will occur:

• If there is no new medical documentation submitted or the information is inadequate, the appeal will be reviewed by an independent third party physician.

• If new medical documentation is submitted, the appeal will be reviewed by the Plan’s Medical  Director.  If  the  recommendation  of  the  Medical  Director  is  to  uphold  the decision, the appeal will be reviewed by an independent third party physician.

• If the request for service is for a non-covered benefit, or exhaustion of benefits, or the member is no longer covered under the Plan, the appeal will be reviewed by the Plan Administrator.

If the appeal (clinical denial) is overturned, a letter of approval and Treatment Authorization Form (TAF) will be faxed to the provider.

If the appeal (clinical denial) is upheld, a letter of denial will be faxed to the provider. Questions regarding clinical appeals may be directed to the Medical Management Appeals Coordinator by calling (863) 534-5384.

Claims Appeals
Providers  may  appeal  an  unfavorable  decision  regarding  a  denial  of  claims  payment.    For claims appeals, providers may initially appeal to the Plan for a first level appeal by faxing a completed  Claims  Appeal  form  to  the  Claims  Section  at  (863)  519-4711.  If  the  Appeals Coordinator of the Plan upholds its initial claims payment decision, the provider may appeal a second time for a second review and final determination by the Plan Administrator. Please refer to the Claims Section for more detailed information pertaining to the appeal of a claim. Questions  regarding  claim(s)  appeals  may  be  directed  to  the  Claims  Section  Appeals Coordinator by calling (863) 519-2086.

Denied as - rendering provider not eligible to perform the service, missing / invalid HCPC or NDC code

$
0
0
Claim Errors (Remittance Advice Remarks) 

•  The rendering provider is not eligible to perform the service billed (185) or claim/ service lacks information which is needed for adjudication. (16/MA30)
o Service code not covered to the provider type or specialty Note: If a procedure code is not covered, the provider will need to submit documentation for review to Molina per the following:
•  The request must submitted in writing
•  The request must be supported with documentation
o documentation should include any claim  examples or indicate why the code should be payable
•  If there is no supporting documentation, the request will not be considered.


•  Missing/incomplete/invalid HCPCS Code (A1/M20)
o Validate code keyed correctly
o Validate code is current for Date of Service (DOS)


•  Missing/incomplete/invalid/deactivated/withdrawn National Drug Code (NDC) (16/M119)
o For resolution to these denials, please refer to www.dhhr.wv.gov/bms  Select Drug Code/NDC Drug Information. NDC, unit of measure and units should be submitted on Medicare primary claims  even though not required by Medicare) so the information will cross over to Medicaid, eliminating  the need to submit Medicaid secondary claims on paper.
   
•  Incomplete/invalid plan information for other insurance (Invalid Medicare Action Code) (16/N245)
o Claims denied by Medicare and submitted electronically must include a Medicare Action Code (MAC)

•  This service/equipment/drug is not covered under the patient‟s current benefit plan (204)
o Non-covered WV Medicaid Service

•  This case may be covered by another payer per coordination of benefits/secondary
 payment cannot be considered without the identity of or payment information from the primary payer.  The information was either not reported or was illegible. (22/MA04)
o Payer information is not submitted on electronic claim
o Explanation of Benefit (EOB) is not submitted with paper claim
 
•  Charges are covered under a capitation agreement/managed care plan (24)
o For members enrolled in Medicaid MCO – MCO is responsible for the service
o For Members who have a PAAS provider, PAAS approval is required
–View member‟s Medicaid Card to verify MCO or PAAS information
–Utilize AVRS to verify MCO or PAAS information

Medicare unprocessable claim, incomplet information, invalid information claim process method.

$
0
0
Incomplete or Invalid Claims Processing Terminology

The following definitions apply to §80.3.2. For carriers the requirements apply to Part B assigned and unassigned claims (Form CMS-1500) or electronic data interchange equivalent.

Unprocessable Claim - Any claim with incomplete or missing, required information, or any claim that contains complete and necessary information; however, the information provided is invalid. Such information may either be required for all claims or required conditionally.

Incomplete Information - Missing, required or conditional information on a claim (e.g., no Unique Physician Identification Number (UPIN) / Provider Identification Number (PIN) or National Provider Identifier (NPI) when effective).

Invalid Information - Complete required or conditional information on a claim that is illogical, or incorrect (e.g., incorrect UPIN/PIN or NPI when effective), or no longer in effect (e.g., an expired number).

Required - Any data element that is needed in order to process a claim (e.g., Provider Name, Date of Service).

Not Required - Any data element that is optional or is not needed by Medicare in order to process a claim (e.g., Patient’s Marital Status).

Conditional - Any data element that must be completed if other conditions exist (e.g., if there is insurance primary to Medicare, then the primary insurer’s group name and number must be entered on a claim or if the insured is different from the patient, then the insured’s name must be entered on a claim).

Return as Unprocessable or Return to Provider (RTP)- Returning a claim as unprocessable to the provider (RTP) does not mean that the carrier or FI should physically return every claim it received with incomplete or invalid information. The term “return to provider” is used to refer to the many processes utilized today for notifying the provider or supplier of service that their claim cannot be processed, and that it must be corrected or resubmitted. Some (not all) of the various techniques for returning claims as unprocessable include:

• Incomplete or invalid information is detected at the front-end of the carrier or FI claims processing system. The claim is returned to the provider (RTP’d) either electronically or in a hardcopy/checklist type form explaining the error(s) and how to correct the errors prior to resubmission. Claim data are not retained in the system for these RTP'd claims. No RA is issued.

• Incomplete or invalid information is detected at the front-end of the claims processing system and is suspended and developed. If requested corrections and/or medical documentation are submitted within a 45-day period, the claim is processed. Otherwise, the suspended portion is returned and the supplier or provider of service is notified by means of the RA.

• Incomplete or invalid information is detected within the claims processing system and is rejected through the remittance process. Suppliers or providers of service are notified of any error(s) through the remittance notice and how to correct prior to resubmission. A record of the claim is retained in the system (NOTE: This applies to carriers only. FIs do not use the remittance advice process for return to provider (RTP)).


A claim returned as unprocessable for incomplete or invalid information does not meet the criteria to be considered as a claim, is not denied, and, as such, is not afforded appeal rights.

Medicare way of Handling Incomplete or Invalid Claims

$
0
0
Claims processing specifications describe whether a data element is required, not required, or conditional (a data element which is required when certain conditions exist). The status of these data elements will affect whether or not an incomplete or invalid claim (hardcopy or electronic) will be "returned as unprocessable" or “returned to provider” (RTP) by the carrier or FI, respectively. The carrier or FI shall not deny claims and afford appeal rights for incomplete or invalid information as specified in this instruction. (See §80.3.1 for Definitions.)

If a data element is required and it is not accurately entered in the appropriate field, the carrier or FI returns the claim to the provider of service.

• If a data element is required, or is conditional (a data element that is required when certain conditions exist) and the conditions of use apply) and is missing or not accurately entered in its appropriate field, return as unprocessable or RTP the claim to either the supplier or provider of service.
• If a claim must be returned as unprocessable or RTP for incomplete or invalid information, the carrier or FI must, at minimum, notify the provider of service of the following information:
o Beneficiary’s Name;
o Claim Number; HIC Number or HICN or Health Insurance Claim Number. This has never been HI Claim Number.
o Dates of Service (MMDDCCYY) (Eight-digit date format effective as of October 1, 1998);
o Patient Account or Control Number (only if submitted);
o Medical Record Number (FIs only, if submitted); and
o Explanation of Errors (e.g., Remittance Advice Reason and Remark Codes)


NOTE: Some of the information listed above may in fact be the information missing from the claim. If this occurs, the carrier or FI includes what is available.

Depending upon the means of return of a claim, the supplier or provider of service has various options for correcting claims returned as unprocessable or RTP for incomplete or invalid information. They may submit corrections either in writing, on-line, or via telephone when the claim was suspended for development, or submit as a “corrected” claim or as an entirely new claim if data from the original claim was not retained in the system, as with a front-end return, or if a remittance advice was used to return the claim. The chosen mode of submission, however, must be currently supported and appropriate with the action taken on the claim.

NOTE: The supplier or provider of service must not be denied any services (e.g., modes of submission or customer service), other than a review, to which they would ordinarily have access.

• If a claim or a portion of a claim is “returned as unprocessable” or RTP for incomplete or invalid information, the carrier or FI does not generate an MSN to the beneficiary.
• The notice to the provider or supplier will not contain the usual reconsideration notice, but will show each applicable error code or equivalent message.
• If the carrier or FI uses an electronic or paper remittance advice notice to return an unprocessable claim, or a portion of unprocessable claim:

1. The remittance advice must demonstrate all applicable error codes. However, there must be a minimum of two codes on the remittance notice (including code Remittance Advice Remark Code : MA130).
2. The returned claim or portion must be stored and annotated, as such, in history, if applicable. If contractors choose to suspend and develop claims, a mechanism must be in place where the carrier or FI can re-activate the claim or portion for final adjudication.

Submitting correction claim for suspended claim.

$
0
0
Special Considerations

• If a “suspense” system is used for incomplete or invalid claims, the carrier or FI will not deny the claim with appeal rights if corrections are not received within the suspense period, or if corrections are inaccurate. The carrier must return the unprocessable claim through the remittance process, without offering appeal rights, to the provider of service or supplier. The FI uses the RTP process.

For assigned and unassigned claims submitted by beneficiaries (Form CMS-1490S), that are incomplete or contain invalid information, contractors shall manually return the claims to the beneficiaries. If the beneficiary furnishes all other information but fails to supply the provider or supplier’s NPI, and the contractor can determine the NPI using the NPI registry, the contractor shall continue to process and adjudicate the claim. If the contractor determines that the provider or supplier was not a Medicare enrolled provider with a valid NPI, the contractor shall follow previously established procedures in order to process and adjudicate the claim.

Contractors shall send a letter to the beneficiary with information explaining which information is missing, incorrect or invalid; information explaining the mandatory claims filing requirements; instructions for resubmitting the claim if the provider or supplier refuses to file the claim, or enroll in Medicare, and shall include language encouraging the beneficiary to seek non-emergency care from a provider or supplier that is enrolled in the Medicare program. Contractors shall also notify the provider or supplier about his/her obligation to submit claims on behalf of Medicare beneficiaries and that providers and suppliers are required to enroll in the Medicare program to receive reimbursement.

Contractors shall consider a complete claim to have all items on the Form CMS-1490S completed along with an itemized bill with the following information: date of service, place of service, description of each surgical or medical service or supply furnished; charge for each service; treating doctor’s or supplier’s name and address; diagnosis code; procedure code and the provider or supplier’s NPI. Required information on a claim must be valid for the claim to be considered as complete.

If a beneficiary submits a claim on the Form CMS-1500, return the Form CMS-1500 claim to the beneficiary, and include a copy of the Form CMS-1490S, along with a letter instructing the beneficiary to complete and return the Form CMS-1490S for processing within the time period prescribed in §70.5 above. Include in the letter a description of missing, invalid or incomplete items required for the Form CMS-1490S that were not included with the submitted Form CMS-1500 or were invalid.

PART A - Reject reason code and steps to avoid this rejections - 34538 and 39929

$
0
0

Q: We are receiving reject reason code 34538, so what steps can we take to avoid this reason code?

Reason Code : 34538
Description : CLAIM SUBMITTED AS MEDICARE PRIMARY AND A POSITIVE WORKING ELDERLY RECORD EXISTS AT CWF. THE CONTRACTOR ID EQUAL TO '11121'. THE CLAIM SHOULD BE BILLED TO THE EMPLOYER GROUP HEALTH PLAN.

A: You are receiving this reason code when the beneficiary or the spouse was/is working for the date of service(s) and the employer’s insurance is primary to Medicare.
• Upon patient registration and prior to submitting the claim, have the beneficiary complete the Medicare secondary payer (MSP) questionnaire.
• Confirm the beneficiary’s eligibility via direct data entry (DDE), the interactive voice response (IVR) system, or take advantage of the Secure Provider Online Tool (SPOT), where you can view claims status, eligibility and benefits, payment information, and comparative billing data in a secure online environment. File the claim to the primary insurance listed on the beneficiary’s records and then to Medicare for secondary payment consideration


Reject reason code 39929 FAQ
Q: We are receiving reject reason code 39929, so what steps can we take to avoid this reason code?
Reason Code : 39929
Description : THIS CLAIM HAS REJECTED DUE TO ALL LINES ITEMS HAVE REJECTED AND/OR REJECTED AND DENIED. REVIEW EACH LINE ITEM TO IDENTIFY THE APPLICABLE LINE EDIT, AND UTILIZE THE REASON CODE NARRATIVES TO IDENTIFY POSSIBLE BILLING ERROR(S). IF THE PRIMARY PROCEDURE LINE IS NOT PAYABLE DUE TO AN EDIT ASSIGNED,THEN ALL INCIDENTAL LINES ON THE SAME DATE OF SERVICE WILL NOT BE PAYABLE DUE TO OTHER RELATED EDITS. *****************************************************************************

IF AN ADJUSTMENT NEEDS TO BE SUBMITT ED TO CORRECT BILLING ERROR(S) ON A REJECTED LINE ITEM, THEN EACH APPLICABLE LINE ITEM WILL NEED TO BE DELETED AND RE-KEYED IN ITS ENTIRETY IN ORDER FOR THE PREVIOUS EDIT TO BE DELETED. ALSO, REMEMBER INCIDENTAL LINES WILL NEED TO BE DELETED AND RE-KEYED.

A: You are receiving this reason code which indicates the claim has rejected due to all line items rejecting and/or rejected and denied. There could be several reasons your claim is receiving this reject reason code. There are several ways you can review the claim and see the line item reason code:

Direct data entry (DDE) users -- open the claim Once you have this reason code, you can PF1 and key the number in the reason code field to pull the description.
• If the claim is in a rejected status, you may adjust the claim, fix the line item, and resubmit.
• If the claim is in a denied status, you may not adjust a denied line item. You must go through the appeals process.
• Review the 201 report through DDE for history of the claims submitted.
• Review the remittance advice to obtain a history of the claims submitted.
There can be numerous reason codes that can fall under the code 39929. A few examples of a line item reason code is:
• W7049 -- service on the same day as inpatient procedure
• W7018 -- inpatient procedure

Returned as unprocessable claim - reason and remark codes

$
0
0
Carriers must return a claim as unprocessable to a provider of service or supplier and use the indicated remark code, or select and use another appropriate remark code, if the claim is returned through the remittance advice or notice process. In most cases, reason code 16, "Claim/service lacks information that is needed for adjudication", will be used in tandem with the appropriate remark code that specifies the missing information.

Carriers shall return a claim as unprocessable:

1. If a claim lacks a valid Medicare Health Insurance Claim Number (HICN) in item 1a. or contains an invalid HICN in item 1a. (Remark code MA61.)

2. If a claim lacks a valid patient’s last and first name as seen on the patient’s Medicare card or contains an invalid patient’s last and first name as seen on the patient’s Medicare card. (Remark code MA36.)

3. If a claim does not indicate in item 11 whether or not a primary insurer to Medicare exists. (Remark code MA83 or MA92.)

4. If a claim lacks a valid patient or authorized person’s signature in item 12 or contains an invalid patient or authorized person’s signature in item 12. (See “Exceptions,” bullet number one. Remark code MA75.)

5. If a claim lacks a valid “from” date of service in item 24A or contains an invalid “from” date of service in item 24A. (Remark code M52.)

6. If a claim lacks a valid place of service (POS) code in item 24B or contains an invalid POS code in item 24B, return the claim as unprocessable to the provider or supplier. Effective for claims received on or after April 1, 2004, on the Form CMS-1500, if a claim contains more than one POS (other than Home – 12), for services paid under the MPFS and anesthesia services.

Effective January 1, 2011, for claims processed on or after January 1, 2011 on the Form CMS-1500, if a claim contains more than one POS, including Home – 12, (or any POS contractors consider to be Home), for services paid under the MPFS and anesthesia services.
(Remark code M77.)

7. If a claim lacks a valid procedure or HCPCS code (including Levels 1-3, “unlisted procedure codes,” and “not otherwise classified” codes) in item 24D or contains an invalid or obsolete procedure or HCPCS code (including Levels 1-3, “unlisted procedure codes,” and “not otherwise classified” codes) in item 24D. (Remark code M20 or M51.)
NOTE: Level 3 HCPCS are not valid under HIPAA after Dec 31, 2003.

8. If a claim lacks a charge for each listed service. (Remark code M79.)

9. If a claim does not indicate at least 1 day or unit in item 24G (Remark Code M53.) (Note: To avoid returning the claim as “unprocessable” when the information in this item is missing, the carrier must program the system to automatically default to “1” unit).

10. If a claim lacks a signature from a provider of service or supplier, or their representative. (See “Exceptions,” bullet number one; Remark code MA70 for a missing provider representative signature, or code MA81 for a missing physician/supplier/practitioner signature.)

11. If a claim does not contain in item 33:

a. A billing name, address, ZIP Code, and telephone number of a provider of service or supplier. (Remark code N256 or N258.)
AND EITHER

b. A valid PIN number or, for DMERC claims, a valid National Supplier Clearinghouse number (NPI in item 33a. of the Form CMS-1500 (8/05) when the NPI is required) for the performing provider of service or supplier who is not a member of a group practice. (Remark code N257)
OR
c. A valid group PIN (or NPI when required) number or, for DMERC claims, a valid National Supplier Clearinghouse number (NPI in item 33a. of the Form CMS-1500 (8/05), when the NPI is required) for performing providers of service or suppliers who are members of a group practice. (Remark code N257)

12. If a claim does not contain in Item 33a., Form CMS 1500 (08-05), the NPI, when required, of the billing provider, supplier, or group. (Remark Code N257 or MA112.)

13. Effective May 23, 2008, if a claim contains a legacy provider identifier, e.g., PIN, UPIN, or National Supplier Clearinghouse number. (Remark Code N 257)
NOTE: Claims are not to be returned as unprocessable in situations where an NPI is not required (e.g., foreign claims, deceased provider claims, other situations as allowed by CMS in the future) and legacy numbers are reported on the claim. Such claims are to be processed in accordance with the established procedures for these claims.


Specialty specific unprocessable returned claims

$
0
0
Carriers must return the following claim as unprocessable to the provider of service/supplier:

a. For chiropractor claims:

1. If the x-ray date is not entered in item 19 for claims with dates of service prior to January 1, 2000. Entry of an x-ray date is not required for claims with dates of service on or after January 1, 2000.

2. If the initial date “actual” treatment occurred is not entered in item 14. (Remark code MA122 is used.)

b. For certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) and anesthesia assistant (AA) claims, if the CRNA or AA is employed by a group (such as a hospital, physician, or ASC) and the group’s name, address, and ZIP Code is not entered in item 33 or if the NPI is not entered in item 33a of the Form CMS-1500, if their personal NPI is not entered in item 24J of the Form CMS-1500. (Remark code MA112 is used.)

c. For durable medical, orthotic, and prosthetic claims, if the name, address, and ZIP Code of the location where the order was accepted were not entered in item 32. (Remark code MA 114 is used.)

d. For physicians who maintain dialysis patients and receive a monthly capitation payment:

1. If the physician is a member of a professional corporation, similar group, or clinic, and the NPI is not entered in item 24J of the Form CMS-1500. (Remark code N290 is used.)

2. If the name, address, and ZIP Code of the facility other than the patient’s home or physician’s office involved with the patient’s maintenance of care and training is not entered in item 32. (Remark code MA114 is used.) Effective for claims received on or after April 1, 2004, the name, address, and ZIP Code of the service location for all services other than those furnished in place of service home – 12 must be entered

e. For routine foot care claims, if the date the patient was last seen and the attending physician’s NPI is not present in item 19. (Remark code N324 or N253 is used.)

f. For immunosuppressive drug claims, if a referring/ordering physician, physician’s assistant, nurse practitioner, clinical nurse specialist was used and their name is not present in items 17 or 17a or if the NPI is not entered in item 17b of the Form CMS-1500. (Remark code N264 or N286 is used.)

g. For all laboratory services, if the services of a referring/ordering physician, physician’s assistant, nurse practitioner, clinical nurse specialist are used and his or her name is not present in items 17 or in 17a or if the NPI is not entered in item 17b of the Form CMS-1500. (Remark code N264 or N286 is used.)

How to avoid an Appeal Tips-1

$
0
0


**Verify all data pertaining to the service is correct. Correct data allows the service to process as is intended, eliminating the need to make corrections after the claim has processed.

** Become familiar with Local Coverage Determinations (LCD).
 
** Become familiar with National Coverage Determinations (NCD)

** Append modifiers to services when appropriate. Failure to append a modifier when appropriate will result in a denial.

** Document a repeat or duplicate service to reflect it is a distinct and separate service. Failure to document a repeat or duplicate service will result in a denial.

** Submit supporting documentation with the claim when certain modifiers e.g. 52 or 22 are appended to the service or when a LCD or NCD indicates documentation is required. Failure to submit the documentation will result in a denial.

** Comply with requests for supporting documentation. Failure to comply with the request will result in a denial.

** The supporting documentation must include the rendering physician's signature. Failure to provide a valid signature will result in a denial.

** Enter the concise description of an unlisted procedure code (an NOC code) or a "not otherwise classified" code. Failure to describe the NOC or other scenarios listed below will result in a denial.

** When Medicare is the secondary payer (MSP) the claim must include information from the primary insurer. Failure to include this information will result in a denial.

Verify all data pertaining to the service is correct. Correct data allows the service to process as is intended, eliminating the need to make corrections after the claim has processed.

**  NPI of Billing Physician
**  Assignment or Non-assignment of claim
**  Health Insurance Number (HIC) of the beneficiary
**  Zip Code of the place of service
**  All related diagnosis reported with the highest degree of specificity
**  NPI of Referring Physician
**  Date of service
**  Place of service
**  Procedure code
**  Modifiers when applicable
**  Number of service(s)
**  Billed amount for each service
**  NPI of Rendering Physician
**  Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment Number (CLIA) for laboratory services
**  The date last seen/X-ray date, initial treatment date for Podiatry, Physical Therapy and Chiropractic services
**  Primary payer data

Become familiar with Local Coverage Determinations (LCD).

**  An LCD is a decision by a Medicare contractor whether to cover a particular item or service.  LCDs contain âœreasonable and necessary information and are administrative and educational tools to assist you in submitting correct claims for payment.

**  LCDs are located in the Medical Policy Center on the Novitas Solutions website.
Become familiar with National Coverage Determinations (NCD).

**  The National Coverage Determinations Manual describes whether specific medical items, services, treatment procedures, or technologies can be paid for under Medicare. All decisions that items, services, etc. are not covered are based on §1862(a)(1) of the Act (the “not reasonable and necessary❠exclusion) unless otherwise specifically noted.

Home Health Medical Review Top Denial Reason Codes - how to prevent the denial

$
0
0
Palmetto GBA encourages all providers to review this information when filing claims to prevent denials and to ensure their claims are processed timely.

Face to Face Encounter Requirements Not Met
The services billed were not covered because the documentation submitted for review did not include (adequate) documentation of a face-to-face encounter.

To prevent this denial: The face-to-face encounter must occur no more than 90 days prior to the home health start of care date or within 30 days after the start of care.

Specific documentation related to face to face encounter requirements must be submitted for review. This includes, but is not limited to, the following:
•    The certifying physician must document that he/she or an allowed non-physician practitioner (NPP) had a face-to-face encounter with the patient, including the date of the encounter
•    The documentation of the encounter must include a brief narrative, composed by the certifying physician, describing how the patient’s clinical condition as observed during that encounter supports the patient’s homebound status and need for skilled services
•    The certifying physician must document the encounter either on the certification, which the physician signs and dates, or on a signed addendum to the certification
•    The certifying physician may dictate the face-to-face encounter documentation content to one of the physician’s support personnel to type. The documentation may also be generated from a physician’s electronic health record.

Partial Denial for Therapy Resulting in Medical Review HIPPS Code Change
The services billed were paid at a lower payment level. Based on medical review, the original HIPPS code was changed.

To prevent this denial:
•    Under the Prospective Payment System (PPS), Medicare reimbursement rates are based on the patient’s health condition and care needs. In order to receive a higher level of payment based on therapy services, there should be an adequate number of payable therapy visits to meet the threshold. This may include one type of therapy or a combination of occupational, speech-language pathology, or physical therapy services.
•    Based on the medical records submitted for review, some of the therapy visits were not allowed and reimbursement was adjusted due to a partial denial.

Auto Deny - Requested Records Not Submitted
Medical records were not received in response to an Additional Documentation Request (ADR) in the required time frame; therefore, we were unable to determine medical necessity.

To prevent this denial:
•    Monitor your claim status on Direct Data Entry (DDE). If the claim is in status/location SB6001, the claim has been selected for review and records must be submitted
•    Be aware of the need to submit medical records within 30 days of the ADR date. The ADR date is in the upper left corner of the ADR request
•    Gather all information needed for the claim and submit it all at one time
•    Submit medical records as soon as the ADR is received
•    Attach a copy of the ADR request to each individual claim
•    If responding to multiple ADRs, separate each response and attach a copy of the ADR to each individual set of medical records. Ensure each set of medical records is bound securely so the submitted documentation is not detached or lost.
•    Do not mail packages C.O.D.; we cannot accept them.
•    Return the medical records to the address on the ADR. Be sure to include the appropriate mail code. This ensures your responses are promptly routed to the Medical Review Department


Information Provided Does Not Support the Medical Necessity for This Service
This claim was fully or partially denied because the clinical documentation submitted for review did not support the medical necessity of the skilled services billed. For example, the submitted documentation may have indicated there was no longer a reasonable potential for change in the medical condition, or sufficient time had been allowed for teaching or observation of response to treatment. 

To prevent this denial:

•    Submit all documentation related to the services rendered and billed to Medicare which supports the medical necessity of the services. Note – A legible signature is required on all documentation necessary to support orders and medical necessity.
•    Use the most appropriate ICD-9-CM codes to identify the beneficiary’s medical diagnosis/diagnoses
•    Submit documentation to support the need for skilled care. Some reasons for services may include, but are not limited to, the following:
1.    New onset or acute exacerbation of diagnosis (Include documentation to support signs and symptoms and the date of the new onset or acute exacerbation)
2.    New and/or changed prescription medications - New medications: those the beneficiary has not taken recently, i.e., within the last 30 days. Changed medications: those, which have a change in dosage, frequency, or route of administration within the last 60 days.
3.    Hospitalizations (include date and reason)
4.    Acute change in condition (Be specific and include changes in treatment plan as a result of changes in medical condition, e.g., physician contact, medication changes)
5.    Changes in caregiver status or an unstable caregiving situation (e.g., involvement of many services or community resources, unsafe or unclean environment which interferes with putting the plan into action)
6.    Complicating factors (i.e., simple wound care on lower extremity for a beneficiary with diabetic peripheral angiopathy)
7.    Inherent complexity of services; therefore, the services can be safely and effectively provided only by a skilled professional
8.    Lack of knowledge or understanding of the beneficiary’s care, which requires initial skilled teaching and training of a beneficiary, the beneficiary’s family or caregiver on how to manage the beneficiary’s treatment regime
9.    Reinforcement of previous teaching when there is a change in the beneficiary’s physical location (i.e., discharged from hospital to home)
10.    Any type of re-teaching due to a significant change in a procedure, the beneficiary’s medical condition, when the beneficiary’s caregiver is not properly carrying out the task, or other reasons which may require skilled re-teaching and training activities
11.    The need for a nurse to administer an injection of a self-injectable medication such as insulin or Calcimar. Clinical documentation needs to indicate: (a) the beneficiary’s inability to self-inject and the non-availability of a willing/able caregiver, (b) the appropriate diagnosis to warrant administration of the medication, (c) laboratory results (if required to meet Medicare criteria), and (d) dosage of the medication.
12.    The need for foley/suprapubic catheter changes and/or assessment/instruction regarding complications
13.    The need for gastrostomy tube changes and/or assessment/instruction regarding complications
14.    The need for administration of IM/IV medications based on medical necessity, supporting diagnosis, and accepted standards of medical practice
15.    Dressing changes for complicated wound care including documentation (at least weekly) of wound location, size, depth, drainage, and complaints of pain
16.    The need for management and evaluation of a complex care plan. Answering “yes” to the following questions may be helpful in determining this need:
  •  Is the patient at high risk for hospitalization or exacerbation of a health problem if the plan of care is not implemented properly (e.g., multiple medical problems or diagnosis, limitations in activities of daily living or mental status, cultural barriers, history of repeated hospitalizations)?
  • Does the patient have a complex unskilled care plan (e.g., many medications, treatments, use of complex or multiple pieces of equipment, unusual variety of supplies)?
  • Is there an unstable caregiving situation (e.g., involvement of many services or community resources, unsafe or unclean environment that interferes with putting the plan into action)?
  • Does it require the skills of a registered nurse or a qualified therapist to ensure safe and appropriate implementation of the plan of care?

5DOW4 – Partial Denial Resulting in a LUPA
Based on the medical records submitted for review, a portion of the services provided was denied. This resulted in a Low Utilization Payment Adjustment (LUPA).A LUPA is an episode with four or fewer visits. The payments are based on the wage adjusted per visit amount for each of the visits rendered instead of the full episode amount.

To prevent this denial:
Ensure the documentation submitted for review supports all criteria for all services billed.
 
Unable to Determine Medical Necessity of HIPPS Code Billed as Appropriate OASIS Not Submitted

The services billed were not covered because the home health agency did not submit the OASIS to the State repository for the HIPPS code billed on the claim. The provider should ensure that the OASIS that generated the HIPPS code for the claim is submitted to the state repository and submitted with the medical records in response to an ADR.

To prevent this denial:

Under the HHPPS, an OASIS is a regulatory requirement. If the home health agency does not submit the OASIS, the medical reviewer cannot determine the medical necessity of the level of care billed and no Medicare payment can be made for those services.

Physician's Plan of Care and/or Certification Present - Signed but Not Dated

Physician's Plan of Care and/or Certification Present - No Signature


No Plan of Care or Certification
The services billed were not covered because the home health agency (HHA) did not have the plan of care established and approved by a physician, as required by Medicare, included in the medical records submitted for review and/or the service(s) billed were not covered because the documentation submitted did not include the physician’s signed certification or recertification.

To prevent this denial:
•    Ensure that the appropriate plan of care (POC) is included and that it is legibly signed and dated by the physician prior to billing
•    A plan of care refers to the medical treatment plan established by the treating physician with the assistance of the home health skilled professional. The plan of care contains all pertinent diagnoses, the patient’s mental status, the types of services, supplies, and equipment required, the frequency of visits to be made, prognosis, rehabilitation potential, functional limitations, activities permitted, nutritional requirements, all medications and treatments, safety measures to protect against injury, instructions for timely discharge or referral and any additional items the HHA or physician chooses to include.
•    Ensure that the signed certification or recertification is submitted when responding to an ADR
•    The physician must certify that:
o    The home health services were required because the individual was confined to his/her home and needs intermittent skilled nursing care, physical therapy and/or speech-language pathology, or continues to need occupational therapy;
o    A plan for furnishing such services to the individual has been established and is periodically reviewed by a physician; and
o    The services were furnished while the individual was under the care of a physician
•    Since the certification is closely associated with the POC, the same physician who establishes the plan must also certify to the necessity for home health services. Certifications must be obtained at the time the plan of care is established or as soon thereafter as possible. There is no requirement that a specific form must be used, as long as the intermediary can determine that this requirement is met. When requesting reimbursement for a claim, the provider must have the certification on file and be able to submit this information if medical records are requested by the intermediary.
•    The physician must recertify at least once every 60 days that there is a continuing need for services and should estimate how long services will be needed. The recertification should be obtained at the time the POC is reviewed and must be signed by the same physician who signs the plan of care. When requesting reimbursement for a claim, the provider must have the recertification on file and be able to submit this information if medical records are requested by the intermediary.

Medical Review HIPPS Code Change/Documentation Contradicts MO/M Item(s)
The services billed were paid at a different payment level. Based on medical review, the original HIPPS code was changed. To avoid changes for this reason, the documentation should paint a consistent picture of the patient’s condition.

Under the Prospective Payment System (PPS), Medicare reimbursement rates are based on patient's health condition and care needs. The medical documentation submitted contradicted your response to one or more of the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) items. As a result, reimbursement has been adjusted.

Services Billed Were More Than Ordered
The submitted physician’s orders for services did not cover all of the visits billed. An example of this is when physician’s orders were submitted for seven physical therapy visits; however, 10 were billed. If orders do not cover the visits billed or visits need to be added, submit a corrected, hardcopy UB-04 with a 337 or 327 bill type with the medical records.

To prevent this denial:

In order to avoid unnecessary denials for this reason code, ensure that the physician’s orders (1) include a legible physician signature dated prior to billing Medicare, and (2) cover the services to be billed. The Medicare program requires that the physician order all services and that a plan of care is set up for furnishing services. When responding to an ADR, do the following:

•    Ensure that all orders for services billed are included with the medical records
•    A legible signature is required on all documentation necessary to support orders and medical necessity

Part A - Duplicate reject/return to provider (RTP) reason code and rejection code 76474

$
0
0

Q: My claim rejected, or was returned to provider, as a duplicate of another claim. Can I resubmit the claim? What steps can I take to avoid duplicate claims?

A: Claim system edits are in place to detect duplicate services. The edits search within paid, finalized, pending, and same claim details in history. This means that unless applicable modifiers and/or condition codes are included in your claim, the edits will detect duplicate and repeat services within the same claim and/or based on a claim previously submitted.

The following reject reason codes are commonly seen with this edit
• 38005 -- This claim is a duplicate of a previously submitted inpatient claim
• 38031 -- This outpatient claim is a possible duplicate to a previously submitted outpatient claim
• 38035 -- This outpatient claim is a possible duplicate to a previously submitted outpatient claim for the same provider
• 38200 -- This is an exact duplicate of a previously submitted claim
The following return to provider (RTP) reason codes are commonly seen with this edit:
• 38032 -- This outpatient claim is a duplicate of a previously processed or submitted outpatient claim
• 38037 -- This outpatient claim is a duplicate of a previously processed or submitted outpatient claim
You received the reason code due to one or more of the following items are matching on the claim:
• Health Insurance Claim Number (HICN), provider number, type of bill (TOB)--all three positions of any TOB, statement coverage from and through dates, at least one diagnosis or line item date of service, revenue code, HCPCS code, and/or total charges (0001 revenue line).

To avoid this duplicate in the future, verify the status of your claim(s) prior to filing. There are several ways to do this:
1. If you use direct data entry (DDE) , you can access the beneficiary's HIC number to verify the history of claims you have submitted and the status/location of those claims. Note: you cannot see claims submitted by other facilities.
2. Check status of claims via the Secure Provider Online Tool (SPOT).
3. Contact the interactive voice response (IVR) system by calling (877) 602-8816. There are three breakdowns available: claim status, return to provider and pending claims.
4. Review the remittance advice for the history of the beneficiary's claims.
In addition, if your claim includes repeat services or supplies, append modifiers and/or condition codes, as applicable. If you submit your claims via the electronic data interchange (EDI) gateway pdf.gif, the EDI gateway provides you with confirmation of the batch of claims received. Please wait for this confirmation instead of resubmitting the batch of claims. If you make one change to one claim in the batch and resubmit the batch, all the claims in the batch go to the fiscal intermediary shared system (FISS), resulting in duplicate claims. Do not resubmit the entire batch; resubmit corrected claims only.

Note: If a third party vendor, billing service, or clearinghouse submits claims on your behalf, contact them to ensure they are not resubmitting entire batches of claims as described above. In addition, occasional software glitches can cause the resubmittal of an entire batch. Be aware that these software or vendor issues reflect directly upon the provider and are problematic, at best, and considered possible abuse, at worst.

Listed below are some recommendations, when additional action is required to correct your claim(s):
• You have two options when the original processed claim needs to be updated or corrected.
1. You may make updates by adjusting the original processed claim (TOB xx7).
2. You may cancel the original processed claim (TOB xx8), but must wait for the cancelled claim to finalize prior to submitting the corrections on a new claim.
• When two claims were submitted at the same time and duplicated against each other, you may submit a new claim.
• No action is required when the claim is an exact duplicate to a previously processed claim.

Avoiding reason code 76474 
Q: We are receiving reject reason code 76474, so what steps can we take to avoid this reason code?

Reason code: 76474
Description : OUTPATIENT PHYSICAL AND SLP THERAPY EXPENSE LIMIT OVER APPLIED. PT/SLP EXPENSE SUBMITTED IS GREATER THAN THE EXPENSE TO BE MET. TYPE OF BILL '12X' (EXCLUDING CAH PROVIDER RANGE 'XX1300-XX1399') AND '13X' WITH MODIFIER 'GN' OR 'GP' HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE EDI TING LOGIC FOR PT/SLP CAP EFFECTIVE FOR DATES OF SERVICE ON OR AFTER 10/01/2012 THROUGH 12/31/2012. -OR- PT/SLP ADJUSTMENT NECESSARY FOR MSP CLAIM.

A: You are receiving this reason code when the patient has met the Medicare annual therapy cap limit for the calendar year.
• Confirm the beneficiary’s physical and occupational therapy cap information via the following:
• Interactive voice response (IVR) system
• Main menu select option 5 for Eligibility, then select option 3 for physical and occupational therapy information.
or
• Secure Provider Online tool (the SPOT) the Eligibility/Benefits Inquiry page, if the required beneficiary information is entered, the Benefits/Eligibility submenu will be visible and more beneficiary information/history will be accessible for example Deductibles/Caps with the following:
• Beneficiary’s Occupational Therapy information:
• Calendar Year -- the calendar year associated with the used dollar amount that has been applied to the capitation limit for occupational therapy services.
• Used Amount -- the used dollar amount that has been applied to the capitation limit for occupational therapy services for the calendar year indicated.
• Beneficiary’s Physical and Speech Therapy information:
• Calendar Year -- the calendar year associated with the used dollar amount that has been applied to the capitation limit for physical and speech therapy services.
• Used Amount -- the used dollar amount that has been applied to the capitation limit for physical and speech therapy services for the calendar year indicated.
• Refer to the Rehabilitation Services specialty page designed specifically for rehabilitation service providers.



Reject reason code C7010 / T5052 reason and action

$
0
0

Q: We are receiving reject reason code C7010. What steps can we take to avoid this reason code?

Reason Code: C7010
Description : THE EDITED INPATIENT OR OUTPATIENT CLAIM HAS FROM/THRU DATES THAT OVERLAP A HOSPICE ELECTION PERIOD AND IS NOT INDICATED AS TREATMENT OF A NON-TERMINAL CONDITION (CONDITION CODE '07'). OR A MCCD/DMD NOTICE OF ELECTION (89A) FROM DATE OVERLAPS A HOSPICE ELE CTION PERIOD.

A: You are receiving this reason code when the beneficiary was/is enrolled in a hospice election period for the date of service(s).
• Confirm the beneficiary’s eligibility via direct data entry (DDE), interactive voice response (IVR) system, or Secure Provider Online Tool (the SPOT)
• If the information is invalid
Contact the hospice provider and ask them to submit their last claim for the beneficiary with occurrence code 42 and the date of disenrollment. Once the records are deleted or updated, refile the claim to Medicare
• If the information is valid and the services provided to the beneficiary are related to their terminal condition for hospice services
Refile the claim with the hospice provider listed on the beneficiary’s records
• If the information is valid and the services provided to the beneficiary are not related to their terminal condition for hospice services
Refile the claim with a condition code 07 (treatment of non-terminal condition for hospice patient)

Reject reason code T5052
Q: We are receiving reject reason code T5052. What steps can we take to avoid this reason code?

Reason Code : T5052
Description : THE CENTER FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES RECORDS INDICATE THE THE BENEFICIARY IS NOT IN FILE. PLEASE VERIFY THE BENEFICIARY'S IDENTIFICATION AND SUBMIT A NEW CLAIM.

A: You are receiving this reason code when the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) records indicate the beneficiary is not on file. Verify the beneficiary’s Medicare health identification number and resubmit the claim if the patient is eligible for Medicare Part A coverage.
There are several ways to obtain beneficiary eligibility:
• Users can access eligibility information via direct data entry (DDE) .
• Contact the interactive voice response (IVR) system by calling (877) 602-8816.
• Note: Customer service representatives cannot assist you with eligibility information and are required, by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), to refer you to the IVR.
• 270/271 eligibility transactions -- you can obtain eligibility information in a batch format for a number of beneficiaries.
• Confirm the beneficiary’s eligibility via the SPOT (Secure Provider Online Tool).
Always remember to check with the beneficiary and/or representative for eligibility prior to submitting claims to Medicare.
There are also a few things you can do when a beneficiary comes to your facility:
• Always obtain a copy of the red, white, and blue Medicare card prior to providing services.
• Ensure the eligibility dates on the card indicate their coverage is currently valid and not expired or a future date.
• Make sure the name on the claim matches the name as it appears on the Medicare red, white, and blue card. Do not use nicknames.
• If everything matches on the Medicare card, the beneficiary should verify eligibility with the Social Security Administration (SSA)

Viewing all 194 articles
Browse latest View live